Author: Abu Raef
Freemasonry (part 16)
Other Masonic Politicians
In the previous discussion, we examined a group of politicians who followed Freemasonry and were influenced by it. In this section, we continue listing these politicians.
-
Adolphe Cremieux (Isaac Cremieux) (d. 1880)
He was the Minister of Justice of France in 1848 and the head of the Jewish community of Paris. He was a Zionist Mason and served as the “Grand Master” of the Grand Masonic Lodge of Paris. Wherever Jews lived, he supported their causes. He traveled to many countries to secure Jewish interests and official privileges. [1]
-
Ernesto Nathan (d. 1921)
An Italian politician who served as the Mayor of Rome from 1907 to 1913. During his time in office, he worked to remove religious education from all civil educational institutions. Nathan was a Jewish Mason and held the position of “High Grand Master” (the highest honorary rank) of the Grand Orient” lodge in Italy. [2]
-
Walther Rathenau (d. 1922)
A German politician and one of the leaders of German industry and economy before World War I. He was a Jewish Mason. One of his famous statements is:
“Three hundred politicians who know one another run the affairs of Europe—and now the whole world—and they choose their own successors.” [3]
-
Mustafa Kamal Atatürk (d. 1938)
A well-known Turkish commander who abolished the Islamic Caliphate and called for the removal of Islam as the official religion of the new Turkish state. He was a Mason who showed open hostility toward Islamic symbols. For this reason, he became a model figure praised by Masonic circles and presented as an example to follow.
Atatürk was also among the founders of the “Young Turks” party [4]. According to official Masonic publications, this party was fully composed of Masons, and its main leaders were Jews. The party played a major role in the fall of Sultan Abdul Hamid, and even the Sultan himself testified to this matter. [5]
Were These Leaders Unaware of the Hidden Goals of Freemasonry?
Some may claim that these leaders, like ordinary Masons, were unaware of the true nature and hidden goals of Freemasonry.
However, even though this claim might seem possible, the answer is clear. These politicians were not ordinary figures in politics. They were among the most intelligent and dangerous elites in human history—people who established full governments and controlled systems and tools that allowed them to uncover the deepest secrets of secret organizations around them.
Moreover, in the case of some of them, there is proven cooperation and support for the hidden goals of Freemasonry—ranging from serving Zionism to opposing religion and promoting atheism and moral freedom without limits. [6]
Third: Involvement of Masonic Members in Violent Political Actions
One clear sign of Freemasonry’s involvement in destructive political activities is the proven role it played in criminal acts that greatly changed political situations, whether at the national or global level. Examples include:
-
The Assassination of the Austrian Crown Prince and the Start of World War I:
Political sources confirm that the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria on 28 June 1914 was carried out by one of the Masonic gangs in Bosnia. The plan was issued by the Grand Masonic Lodge of the “Grand Orient of France.” [7]
The Austrian politician Friedrich Fichtl, who lived at that time, said: “During the trial of the assassins of the Austrian crown prince and his wife, it was clearly proven that the assassination plan not only came from the Grand Masonic Lodge of the ‘Grand Orient of France,’ but that some of the killers themselves were Masons. It was also proven that the money paid to the terrorists—although they received only a small part of it—came from a Masonic source.” [8]
This incident became the spark that ignited World War I, a war that lasted nearly four years and left millions of dead. During that war, the German slogan was “Jews and Masons.”
Fichtl further states: “In any case, accusing Masons of active participation in such a terrible crime is not something new.” [9]
-
Conspiracy Against the State in Italy:
In 1981, Italian security agencies discovered secret documents revealing the connection between Freemasonry and political and power figures in the country. It became clear that Freemasonry controlled around 962 dangerous individuals from different sectors, including the army, police, and government.
These individuals were involved in corrupt actions aimed at creating instability, weakening authority, and overthrowing structures—such as murder, money laundering, and illegal trade. [10]
It was also revealed that global Zionism supported some of these individuals by providing information about their own activities and those of their rivals.
These are only part of the evidence. Many more examples exist in European and other sources, all clearly confirming that Freemasonry has been involved in secret activities and political conspiracies—activities that have cost many people their lives.
It can even be said that politics has been the main field of action for this movement. This is because its primary goal has been to strike governments and political movements and to prepare the ground for the type of rule it seeks. These goals, and others, became visible through active involvement in politics.
Continues…
Previous Part/ Next Part
References:
[1] Global Freemasonry, p. 87.
[2] The same source, p. 84.
[3] Secrets of Freemasonry, p. 53.
[4] This party was a political and Masonic party. At the beginning, it was formed among military students who held hatred and resentment toward Sultan Abdul Hamid and his style of governance. Shortly after, the Dönmeh Jews, who outwardly presented themselves as Muslims, along with some major political figures of Turkey, joined this party. As a result, a group known as the Committee of Union and Progress was formed, which succeeded in removing Sultan Abdul Hamid from power in 1909.
[5] Freemasonry Between Its Supporters and Opponents, p. 306.
[6] The same source.
[7] Freemasonry Between Its Supporters and Opponents, p. 307.
[8] Global Freemasonry, p. 145.
[9] The same source, p. 13.
[10] Freemasonry Between Its Supporters and Opponents, p. 309.
