The beginning of the “feminism” movement (3rd part)
In the second part of this article, it was recalled how different non-Islamic societies deprived women of their basic rights and allowed all kinds of oppression against them. Over time, these reactions caused women to create organizations for themselves and demand their basic rights; Therefore, they organized gatherings and organized these gatherings, and famous writers and writers and a number of politicians agreed with them, and the fame of these activities spread in Western countries, and they gained many fans and many women joined these groups. Finally, this is how the “feminism” movement came into existence.
Some researchers believe that the phenomenon of “feminism” emerged in three stages and in different periods of time, and it took new life in each stage. And now, we briefly present its three stages to dear readers:
first stage
The result of these inequalities was the emergence of the first spark of the wave of “feminism” in England, which was formed due to the publication of the 300-page statement of “Mary Wollstone Graft”. The first stage lasted from 1830 to 1920. At this stage, the supporters of women’s rights stood up against those who considered women not human, but a lowly creature who should be at the service of the highest of creations, man.
The context of this stage is in the perspective of “classical liberal rights” whose general plan was to grant the right to vote to women and expand their civil, political and natural rights.
second stage
This stage continued from 1960 to early 1990. This stage was egalitarian; That is, after proving a place for women in existence and society. Its main claim was to assert women’s rights on an equal basis with men and to oppose all ideologies that advocated inequality and considered men superior to women.
The third stage
The third stage started from the beginning (1990 AD) onwards.
This wave of the feminist movement seeks supremacy. From the point of view of this wave, the previous two waves, because they seek to compare women with men, unconsciously and inwardly believed in the priority and superiority of men, as if these movements themselves believed that women are inferior to men and should be together be equal; Therefore, they have tried to make another man out of a woman and they have not been feminism in the true sense. The independence of a woman and her superiority over a man in all areas of life, which manifests specifically in the game of power, is the third meaning of modern feminism.
Many political schools have risen in favor of women to take advantage of the chaotic market of trampling women’s rights, and those who took full advantage of this situation to make their point and shed crocodile tears for women. Their goal is not to give her the rights of a woman; Rather, their main goal is to destroy religion, and they want to take the attributes of “modesty” and “hijab” from women in the first stage, and then challenge the society through women’s non-hijab, and the violence and conflicts that will come their way in the future. Seizure doesn’t matter to them and it doesn’t bother them, while they experienced all the cases in western countries.
Feminism’s hostility to religion
This movement started in the 19th century as a social movement for women’s suffrage. At first, it focused on women’s rights, which they claimed was that our only and only goals are to bring women to their original position; But little by little their path changed and they fell in love with Islam, religion and religion. They attributed the atrocities that others had done to women in the name of religion to Islam, and in this way they allowed themselves to enter the sanctuary of Islam, and in their first wave, they targeted traditional religiosity and made it the source and cause of submission. They wrote the woman; As the first thinkers of feminism believed that religious institutions were not only involved in ignoring women’s rights; Rather, they have actually been a fundamental source from which anti-woman beliefs and actions have emerged.
(Susan Brannell Anthony) A seminal figure in the women’s suffrage movement has pointed out that women’s worst enemies stand in the pulpit. Mrs. Anthony has often criticized the imitative (traditional) religion and has been labeled as an irreligious person by those who knew her. He said in one of his words: “I can’t imagine a god for the world who likes to sit on my knees and call him by his great name.”
One of the feminist women, the first wave in the 19th century, named (Helen Gardner), wrote in detail about the crimes and oppressions of the Bible and Christianity in its treatment of women: “Religion and the Bible take everything from a woman and give her nothing.” And on the other hand, they ask her to support and love her, and in return they treat her with contempt and oppression, and every oppression and oppression that has been done and continues to be done to women in a Christian region is permitted by the Bible, and those who They have allowed its stabilization and continuation, they are the people who stand on the pulpits.
Helen Gardner’s contempt for religion is not limited to Christianity; As he said in his book (Men, Women and Gods): “Despite the fact that they claim that the source of religion is supernatural and beyond human reason; But it must be tested by human logic.”
He also says: “The only good and worthy thing in any religion is ethics, and there is no connection between ethics and faith.” Morality is defined by good deeds in this world, while faith is defined by unknown standards in another world. Morality is the necessity of our age and faith is a dream that looks forward to eternity. It also says that “morality” rests on a formative evolution, and faith is related to a special revelation, and no woman can accept any revelation that has been presented to this world since then.
This so-called scientist of feminism goes further and pours out his poisonous poison about divine prophets like this: “Moses and Confucius or Muhammad or Paul or Abraham or Brigham Young emphasize that their belief came directly from God and God is with one He had a personal relationship with selected people or all of them. This is a truth that should not have any power over us unless their teachings are compatible with our highest thoughts, our noblest goals and our purest concepts about life.
We can also find this hostility towards religion in the writings and speeches of some of the most prominent feminist women in the first wave. Including (Elizabeth Cady Stanton), who wrote the women’s bible with the intention of destruction. He says: “If today’s feminist women write “Quran Feminine”, they will join the feminist women of more than 100 years ago who were part of the first wave. And probably their extremes and protests were less compared to feminists of other waves.
Feminists’ enmity with religion does not end here, if we look at the second wave, we will face more enmities and we can better understand their essence; As the French philosopher (Simon de Boir) expressed her opposition to religion as follows: “Man enjoys great distinctions; Because he has a god who supports him and approves his actions, and man has power and dominion over woman, and it is his good fortune that this power has been given to him by a supreme being. Jews, Mohammedans, Christians and others believe that man is the true ruler and ruler from God, and because of this and the fear of God, he suppresses any impulse to rebel against the oppressed female sex and suffocates it in the womb.
Mrs. (Gloria Steinem), a prominent feminist of the second wave in matters related to religion, says: “If you think carefully, you will realize that your faith in something is an astonishing deception in the face of life after death; Because even companies, with all the bonus rules they have, don’t try to enforce it after death.”
Also, in an interview, Mrs. Steinem was asked: “What do you think is the biggest problem that women suffer from today?” He answered: What we don’t talk about enough is religion. Spirituality is one thing and religion is another. Religion is just politics in heaven. I believe that it is really obligatory for us to talk about it; Because it gets its power from silence.”
(Susan Shaw) professor of typology and sexology says: “In the light of religious-traditional institutions such as churches, mosques and places of worship, patriarchal and patriarchal system is the dominant religion in the world.”
He also says: “The world is suffering from the problem of a gender with religious dimensions. It is true that we need reform and maybe we need a revolution to destroy the domination of the male gender and rebuild a global shelter of the integration of fairness, justice, reconciliation and love.
The extreme homosexual feminist philosopher (Marie Daly) believed that religion was inherently oppressive to women, and expressed her belief that a woman’s demand for equality in the church could be compared to a black man’s demand for equality in the Klan.
In the third wave, organized hostility to religion intensifies and this hostility takes several forms, including self-flagellation for offering “alternative religion” and “secular spirituality.”
Western countries, America at the top of them, which was a staunch supporter of “feminism” from 1950 to 2000 AD, held numerous meetings as women’s rights in different countries. And these meetings had important goals in advancing feminist and anti-Islamic purposes, the most important of which are:
– Inviting and encouraging people to openly oppose religion, values and moral principles with the plan of downplaying marriage and encouraging indecency and immorality;
– Inviting and encouraging people to cancel religious laws and orders and replace them with global announcements and international treaties;
– Inviting and encouraging people to cancel local traditions and customs and encouraging European culture and globalization;
– An invitation to downplay the position of the father and the place of the man in the house and disobey the man of the house.
Even today, we see that anti-Islamic countries are raising their voices day and night in their media giants addressing Islamic countries and claiming women’s rights; But if their interests are in danger, they will not hesitate to disrespect women and their true face will be revealed.
