Author: M. Farahi Tujegi
Democracy: Minority Rule and Rejection of the Majority
In the continuation of the “minority’s rule over the majority” series of discussions, we will address party rule and explain its dimensions and organization:
Political parties consist of a minority. Among this minority, there exists another minority, which includes the party leader and some of its more powerful members. Among pro-democracy supporters, there is no consensus on the formation of a party and the performance of party work, as this raises key questions: Can parties truly represent the people? Is the party system beneficial or corrupt?
Proponents of Forming Parties Believe:
1. Regular and organized opinion has a positive effect on government goals; for this reason, the formation of parties is necessary.
2. Parties cultivate groups, providing them with political awareness and encouraging public voting.
3. The party system is a strong and necessary foundation for a government based on representation. This system needs parties to present their programs to the people so that citizens can vote for them based on these programs.
4. According to Heschel, one of the critics of democracy, democracy is not possible without organization, and organization is the work of parties.
Criticism of Partisanship is Abundant, Including:
1. It is an exaggeration to claim that parties are the true representatives of public opinion; experience has proven that this is not the case.
2. Although parties are a pillar of democracy, they are also a source of doubt and criticism because:
A. A minority controls them, and this minority often works more for its own interests.

B. They hide behind the principles of democracy.

C. They compete with one another.

D. Party members often strive for their own interests, even when those interests starkly conflict with the public good.

3. Worse than these criticisms are the words of Bartolomeo, who said that parties are the bane of democracy.
4. The most damning critique comes from Lord Halifax, who stated three centuries ago that the best kind of party, if democracy is its basis and criterion, is, to some extent, a conspiracy against the nation. Liking and criticizing parties are not mutually exclusive; on one hand, parties are the cornerstone of democracy, and on the other hand, they can also be its bane. This dual perspective is inherent to the democratic system.
Democracy needs parties; because if elections are conducted in the form of a list, they will be held based on either the relative or majority system. In this case, only parties can provide a comprehensive list of candidates. Even if the list comprises individuals who may be hesitant to put their names and affiliations under the party’s umbrella, their participation in party gatherings and inclusion on the list indicates that they are, in fact, party members.
Continues…
Leave A Reply

Exit mobile version