Author: "Abu Aisha"
Mu’tazila Sect (Seventh section)
The commentator on the creed of Tahaawi writes: “This statement (the one mentioned above) is a rebuttal to the Khawarij and Mutazilites who believe that those who commit major sins will always remain in Hell.”
From the summary of these opinions, it appears that Ahl al-Sunnah wa’l-Jama’ah believe that it is permissible for Allah to go back on His threat, unlike the Mu’tazilites who believe that Allah cannot go against His threat.
Mulla Ali Qari summarizes this issue in his book “Al-Qawl al-Sadeed fi Khalfi al-Wa’eed”: “In summary, the issue in question is that it is not obligatory for Allah to reward for obedience and punish for disobedience, unlike the Khawarij and Mu’tazilites, who believe that punishment for a major sinner who dies without repentance is obligatory on Allah, and that Allah’s pardon is forbidden. They argue that if Allah threatens a major sinner with punishment and does not punish him, it would constitute a breach of threat and a lie, both of which are impossible for Allah.”
Finally, I find it appropriate to remind the esteemed readers of the following points:
1. There are other aspects under this principle (Wad and Wa’ed) that need to be explained, and we will attempt to address them in subsequent sections. In this section, to avoid prolonging the discussion, we refrained from mentioning them. The four most important aspects of this principle are:
– The eligibility of the accountable.
– The idea of compensation.
– The initial condition of man on earth.
– The issue of intercession.
2. The issue of intercession is one of the major matters, and insha’Allah, we will dedicate a complete section to it and mention the opinions of the scholars regarding it.