Author: Abu Raef
Freemasonry (part 47)
Attachment of Jews to European Lands
As noted earlier, although Jews—through their Freemason networks and lobbying efforts—managed to return to the land of Palestine, in reality they have no genuine emotional attachment to it. They are generally disinclined toward living, investing, planning, or pursuing progress there. This lack of motivation is most evident among American Jews.
This reality has also been highlighted by many American writers and thinkers. Among them is the American Jewish journalist William Zuckerman, who vividly illustrates this contradiction. He states: “No amount of agitation and incitement by Jewish nationalists—especially David Ben-Gurion—was able to influence the decision of American Jews to remain in the United States. For the American Jew, Israel is a source of pride and an element of religious identity. Thus, he is willing to offer generous financial support, yet he does not consider it his homeland or the future homeland of his children. This represents a major challenge for Western Jews in their relationship with Israel—one that may ultimately lead to ideological bankruptcy and serious failure.”
The prediction of this journalist regarding the failure of Jewish settlement in Palestine has, to some extent, begun to materialize. For many Jews around the world, this land has come to symbolize insecurity, conflict, and instability. (1)
For this reason, a Zionist migrant, upon reaching his first destination, often finds his enthusiasm for migrating to Palestine diminishing. Instead, cities such as New York, London, or Paris become more appealing places associated with wealth, financial markets, and economic opportunity.
This situation led Rabbi Klauzer to express frustration and anger, writing: “The Jewish people must be compelled to turn toward Palestine, as they are not prepared to understand their present condition or grasp future promises. The American dollar remains their strongest attraction and motivation.”
A subtle definition of a “Zionist” has even circulated: a person who donates from the wealth of one Zionist to enable a third to migrate to Palestine.
This reluctance among Jews to settle in Palestine eventually led Zionist leaders to pressure the United States into enacting laws that placed significant obstacles in the path of Jewish immigration there, thereby redirecting migration toward Israel. (2)
It is conceivable that a time may come when Jews will encourage their Masonic affiliates to migrate to Palestine and rebuild the Temple in place of Zionists, as many are unwilling to abandon the wealth, comfort, and lifestyle they enjoy in Europe and the United States—despite maintaining a doctrinal connection to Palestine. (3)
This idea is also mentioned by MacBride, who suggests that Freemasons may cooperate with Jews in Palestine. He observes: “Freemasons may have altered their objectives, but one thing has remained unchanged—the ‘construction of the Temple.’ This idea has always been central to Masonic lodges, past and present.” He adds: “This Temple represents the greatest symbol and highest aspiration of Masonry. What a great task lies before us, brothers!” (4)
Freemasons in Islamic Countries
Although this topic will be discussed separately, and the influence of Freemasonry in Islamic and Arab countries will be examined in detail, it is important for Muslim societies to pay close attention to MacBride’s statement regarding the core objective of Freemasonry.
There are those who believe that no important position should be entrusted to anyone unless he comes from a deeply rooted Masonic background. This is justified by claims that intelligence agencies linked to Israel provide them with information—information that may be filled with deception. According to MacBride’s account and certain official directives, such individuals are regarded as highly loyal—sometimes even more zealous than Jews themselves.
Therefore, it is essential for Islamic-Arab countries, where Freemasonry has had notable influence, to become aware and vigilant.
To further clarify this issue, another supporter of Freemasonry, Arthur, states: “In the past, Masons were accused of adhering to the religion of the land in which they lived; however, it is now more appropriate to say that they follow a belief shared by all humanity.”
This statement is remarkably explicit, revealing one of the hidden aims of Freemasonry—more clearly than even prominent figures such as Hanna Abi Rashed or Shahin Makarius.
However, when this claim is examined critically—that Freemasons share a unified belief with all humanity—it becomes difficult to justify. Humanity is characterized by a vast diversity of beliefs and ideologies. Even within a single religion, followers are divided into numerous sects and groups. For instance, in North America alone, Christianity encompasses over a hundred denominations, each functioning almost independently. Similar diversity exists within Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, and other traditions.
In India alone, more than 350 religions are said to exist. There are those who worship wealth and desire; even Satan has followers; and millions identify as atheists with no religious affiliation.
Given such diversity, the claim that Freemasons share a unified belief with all humanity appears highly questionable.
To be continued…
Previous Part
References:
1. Freemasonry, the Jews, and the Torah, p. 66, citing: Zionism: A Racist Movement, p. 54, Tripoli Conference, First Edition.
2. Freemasonry: The Complex of Origin and the Shame of the End, p. 50.
3. Freemasonry: The Complex of Origin and the Shame of the End, p. 56.
4. Ibid. (same source)
